| = be bold | Veronica Valeanu [25.Oct.09 16:37] |
| Daniel, i've been reading your poems so far I, as a reader, trust your ability of rendering a consistent message and maneuvering the words' weight plus the fact that you remind me of how i used to write not long ago, trapped inside that urge for rhymes (i thought and still think that if well-handled, they could produce trance or a code for conveying an indirect attitude) but there is a drawback in all this the fact that one can consequently fall prey to clusters of words according to a semantic rigidity i therefore encourage you to go beyond this confinement, to discover wherefrom words could draw a new courage of an own life, a more intense one if rhyming would mean words that accept each other according to their resonance within their horizon, poetry without rhyming could allow tensions between words; not an enemy-like one, but an assamblage,co-functional, con-acting one (as Deleuze once said) take courage in applying your talent and exercising it on new, extended levels! good luck | |
| = You're right | Delivasile Daniel [25.Oct.09 21:25] |
| Well, to be perfectly honest I'm a bit tired of this classic, rugged style though at first it didn't seem so limited for I couldn't conceive rhymeless poetry. I've been writing like this for a few years and I think you're right, I need a different approach now. When I'll succeed you'll read about it, so to speak. Thank you for your words! | |