| = no and no again | Veronica Valeanu [27.Nov.10 16:05] |
| KKS, this is not a poem, it's a thinking process. the first part seems to be Hegel's shart-version agenda, the second is a glam poster with a poor spectacle to offer. when it comes to the semantic part, there are other prb. keep to the rule: first the subject then the predicate. i decided to keep this text here and not in the workshop because it could be a thread to smth simple and interesting, moreover, it could become smth alive. if you want this too. V. | |
| = Guide pl. | Kuldeep Kumar Srivastava [27.Nov.10 18:23] |
| I bow. Agreed. Will try to amend. Need guidence. Regards Kk | |
| = . | Veronica Valeanu [28.Nov.10 12:35] |
| my only advice is to render the concepts through smth real that could denote a concept. | |